Pre-Implementation of Clinical Indicators of Frailty and Complexity in Homecare: An Analysis Based on the Implementation Research Logic Model
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical indicators of frailty and complexity of home care situations are derived from the interRAI HC, but their implementation in practice requires a precise and prior analysis of the care context in which they could be used. The Implementation Research Logic Model (IRLM) is a reference framework that can be used for the whole implementation process including for the pre-implementation, an essential but often neglected step.
Objective: This paper aims to present a procedure to applying the IRLM model that specifies the key elements (determinants, strategies, mechanisms and outcomes) of the pre-implementation stage.
Procedure: Implementation takes place at the Geneva Institution for Home Care and Assistance (institution genevoise de maintien à domicile or imad) in Switzerland. The data collected (e.g., characteristics of the institution, nurse questionnaire) are entered into the IRLM by a working group.
Evaluation: The analysis of pre-implementation elements points to contextual determinants that may promote implementation (e.g., availability of clinical indicators and care protocols) or hinder it (e.g., information overload). In addition, strategies put in place and the outcomes obtained at this stage (e.g., integration of indicators in the patient record, little resistance to change) are described.
Discussion and conclusion: The anticipation and analysis of the conditions in which implementation takes place from the pre-implementation phase provides essential information on recommendations for adapting actions to specific contexts and concrete realities. The implementation of step-by-step strategies should help to meet the challenge of transferring new knowledge to contextualized clinical practice.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors hold the copyright on their papers without restrictions and retain it without restrictions after publication of the papers on the journal’s website.
References
Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J., et Kilbourne, A. M. (2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology, 3(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9
Bleijenbergh, R., Mestdagh, E., Timmermans, O., Van Rompaey, B., et Kuipers, Y. J. (2023). Digital adaptability competency for healthcare professionals: a modified explorative e-Delphi study. Nurse Education in Practice, 67, 103563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103563
Boaz, A., et Hayden, C. (2002). Pro-active evaluators: Enabling research to be useful, usable and used. Evaluation, 8(4), 440-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890260620630
Briggs, R., McDonough, A., Ellis, G., Bennett, K., O'Neill, D., et Robinson, D. (2022). Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for community‐dwelling, high‐risk, frail, older people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012705.pub2
Busnel, C., Bridier-Boloré, A., Marjollet, L., et Perrier-Gros-Claude, O. (2020a). La complexité des prises en soins à domicile. Guide pour les professionnels de l’aide et des soins à domicile. Institution genevoise de maintien à domicile. https://doi.org/10.26039/097C-6316
Busnel, C., Ludwig, C., et Da Rocha Rodrigues, M. G. (2020b). La complexité dans la pratique infirmière : vers un nouveau cadre conceptuel dans les soins infirmiers. Recherche en Soins Infirmiers, 140(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.140.0007
Busnel, C., Marjollet, L., et Perrier-Gros-Claude, O. (2018). Complexité des prises en soins à domicile : développement d’un outil d’évaluation infirmier et résultat d’une étude d’acceptabilité. Revue Francophone Internationale de Recherche Infirmière, 4, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.refiri.2018.02.002
Busnel, C., Mastromauro, L., Zecca, W., et Ludwig, C. (2017). Le RAI Home Care: utilisation, potentiels et limites dans les soins à domicile. Gérontologie et Société 39(153), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.3917/gs1.153.0167
Busnel, C., Perrier-Gros-Claude, O., et Ludwig, C. (2020c). Évaluer la fragilité dans les pratiques de soins : brefs rappels à la lumière de la pandémie de Covid-19. Revue Medicale Suisse, 16(699), 1316-1318. https://www.revmed.ch/RMS/2020/RMS-N-699/Evaluer-la-fragilite-dans-les-pratiques-de-soins-brefs-rappels-a-la-lumiere-de-la-pandemie-de-Covid-19
Busnel, C., Vallet, F., Guéninchault, C., & Ludwig, C. (2023). Indicateurs de fragilité et complexité dérivés de l’interRAI HC Suisse. Revue Médicale Suisse, 19(817), 488-491. https://doi.org/10.53738/revmed.2023.19.817.488
Busnel, C., Vallet, F., et Ludwig, C. (2021). Tooling nurses to assess complexity in routine home care practice: Derivation of a complexity index from the interRAI-HC. Nursing Open, 8, 815-823. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.686
Clegg, A., Young, J., Iliffe, S., Rikkert, M. O., et Rockwood, K. (2013). Frailty in elderly people. The Lancet, 381(9868), 752-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62167-9
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., et Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
Danan, J.-L., Boulangé, M., Coudane, H., et Kanny, G. (2014). De la nécessité d’innover à l’émergence de pratiques innovantes en santé. Hegel, 4(3), 279-286. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/54094
Dent, E., Lien, C., Lim, W. S., Wong, W. C., Wong, C. H., Ng, T. P., Woo, J., Dong, B., de la Vega, S., Hua Poi, P. J., Kamaruzzaman, S. B. B., Won, C., Chen, L.-K., Rockwood, K., Arai, H., Rodriguez-Mañas, L., Cao, L., Cesari, M., Chan, P., Leung, E., Landi, F., Fried, L. P., Morley, J. E., Vellas, B., et Flicker, L. (2017). The Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Frailty. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18(7), 564-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.018
Durlak, J. A. (2015). What everyone should know about implementation. Dans J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. Weissberg, et T. Gullotta (dir..), Handbook of social and emotional learning: research and practice (p. 395-405). The Guilford Press.
Gladman, J. R. F., Conroy, S. P., Ranhoff, A. H., et Gordon, A. L. (2016). New horizons in the implementation and research of comprehensive geriatric assessment: knowing, doing and the ‘know-do’ gap. Age and Ageing, 45(2), 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw012
Glasgow, R. E., Harden, S. M., Gaglio, B., Rabin, B., Smith, M. L., Porter, G. C., Ory, M. G., et Estabrooks, P. A. (2019). RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review. Frontiers in public health, 7(64). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., et Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322-1327. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., Bate, P., et Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
Grimshaw, J. M., Eccles, M. P., Lavis, J. N., Hill, S. J., et Squires, J. E. (2012). Knowledge translation of research findings. Implementation Science, 7(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-50
Hirdes, J. P., Morris, J. N., Perlman, C. M., Saari, M., Betini, G. S., Franco-Martin, M. A., van Hout, H., Stewart, S. L., et Ferris, J. (2022). Mood Disturbances Across the Continuum of Care Based on Self-Report and Clinician Rated Measures in the interRAI Suite of Assessment Instruments. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.787463
Hubbard, R. E., Peel, N. M., Samanta, M., Gray, L. C., Fries, B. E., Mitnitski, A. B., et Rockwood, K. (2015). Derivation of a frailty index from the interRAI acute care instrument. BMC Geriatrics, 15(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0026-z
Jaspal, R., Carriere, K., et Moghaddam, F. (2016). Bridging micro, meso and macro processes in social psychology. Dans J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhary, T. Sato, et V. Dazzani (dir.), Psychology as a science of human being: The Yokohama Manifesto. (p. 1-12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21094-0_15
Juckett, L. A., Oliver, H. V., Hariharan, G., Bunck, L. E., et Devier, A. L. (2023). Strategies for implementing the interRAI home care frailty scale with home-delivered meal clients. Frontiers in public health, 11, 1022735. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1022735
Kitson, A. L., Rycroft-Malone, J., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Seers, K., et Titchen, A. (2008). Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implementation Science, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-1
Klaic, M., Kapp, S., Hudson, P., Chapman, W., Denehy, L., Story, D., et Francis, J. J. (2022). Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework. Implementation Science, 17(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01171-7
Leeman, J., Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Rohweder, C., et Shea, C. M. (2017). Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice. Implementation Science, 12(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x
Lefebvre, H., Roy, O., Sahtali, S., et Rothan-Tondeur, M. (2013). Liens entre recherche et pratique : échange des savoirs, utilisation des données probantes et renouvellement des pratiques. Recherche en soins infirmiers, 114(3), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.114.0031
Ludwig, C., et Busnel, C. (2017). Derivation of a frailty index from the resident assessment instrument - home care adapted for Switzerland: a study based on retrospective data analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 17(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0604-3
Ludwig, C., et Busnel, C. (2020). Derivation of a frailty index from the interRAI-HC to assess frailty among older adults receiving home care and assistance (the “fraXity” study) Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research, 2(2 e200013), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20200013
May, C. R., Johnson, M., et Finch, T. (2016). Implementation, context and complexity. Implementation Science, 11(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0506-3
Metz, A., Bartley, L., Ball, H., Wilson, D., Naoom, S., et Redmond, P. (2015). Active Implementation Frameworks for Successful Service Delivery: Catawba County Child Wellbeing Project. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(4), 415-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514543667
Meyers, D. C., Katz, J., Chien, V., Wandersman, A., Scaccia, J. P., et Wright, A. (2012). Practical implementation science: Developing and piloting the quality implementation tool. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9521-y
Morris, J. N., Berg, K., Björkgren, M., Finne-Soveri, H., Fries, B. E., Frijters, D., Gilgen, R., Gray, L., Hawes, C., Henrard, J.-C., Hirdes, J. P., Ljunggren, G., Nonemaker, S., Steel, K., Szczerbinska, K., Belleville-Taylor, P., Rabinowitz, T., et Smith, T. (2019a). interRAI Clinical Assessment Protocols (interRAI CAPs). À utiliser avec les instruments d'évaluation Soins à domicile et Soins de longue durée en établissement. Édition française pour la Suisse. version 9.1.3. interRAI.
Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Bernabei, R., Steel, K., Ikegami, N., Carpenter, G. I., Gilgen, R., DuPasquier, J.-N., Frijters, D., Henrard, J.-C., Hirdes, J. P., Belleville-Taylor, P., Berg, K., Björkgren, M., Gray, L., Hawes, C., Ljunggren, G., Nonemaker, S., Phillips, C. D., et Zimmermann, S. (2019b). interRAI Home Care Suisse (interRAI HCSuisse) Instrument d'évaluation et manuel. Édition française pour la Suisse. Version 9.4.2. interRAI.
Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Bernabei, R., Steel, K., Ikegami, N., Carpenter, I., Gilgen, R., DuPasquier, J.-N., Frijters, D., Henrard, J.-C., Hirdes, J. P., et Belleville-Taylor, P. (2009). interRAI Home-Care (HC). Assessment Form and User's Manual. Version 9.1, Standard Edition. interRAI.
Norman, K. J., et Hirdes, J. P. (2020). Evaluation of the Predictive Accuracy of the interRAI Falls Clinical Assessment Protocol, Scott Fall Risk Screen, and a Supplementary Falls Risk Assessment Tool Used in Residential Long-Term Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980820000021
Oy Raisoft Ltd. (2021). RAIsoft [Logiciel]. www.raisoft.com
Pan, S. L., et Pee, L. G. (2020). Usable, in-use, and useful research: A 3U framework for demonstrating practice impact. Information Systems Journal, 30(2), 403-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12274
Peters, D. H., Tran, N. T., et Adam, T. (2013). Implementation Research in Health: A Practical Guide, World Health Organization 2013. https://www.unisante.ch/sites/default/files/inline-files/alliancehpsr_irpguide.pdf
Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., et Mittman, B. (2009). Implementation Research in Mental Health Services: an Emerging Science with Conceptual, Methodological, and Training challenges Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 36(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4
Proctor, E. K., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., et Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
Q-Sys AG. (2009). Manuel RAI-Home-Care Suisse. Q-Sys AG.
Ridde, V., et Turcotte-Tremblay, A.-M. (2019). L’analyse des processus de mise en œuvre. Une intervention complexe au Burkina Faso : le financement basé sur les résultats. Dans V. Ridde et C. Dagenais (dir.), Évaluation des interventions de santé mondiale. Méthodes avancées (p. 355-381). Éditions science et bien commun et IRD Editions. https://scienceetbiencommun.pressbooks.pub/evalsantemondiale/chapter/processus/
Searle, S., Mitnitski, A. B., Gahbauer, E., Gill, T., et Rockwood, K. (2008). A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatrics, 8, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-24
Sinn, C.-L. J., Heckman, G., Poss, J. W., Onder, G., Vetrano, D. L., et Hirdes, J. (2020). A comparison of 3 frailty measures and adverse outcomes in the intake home care population: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open, 8(4), E796-E809. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200083
Smith, J. D., Li, D. H., et Rafferty, M. R. (2020). The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects. Implementation Science, 15(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01041-8
Thompson, D. S., Estabrooks, C. A., Scott-Findlay, S., Moore, K., et Wallin, L. (2007). Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 2(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-15
Vermeiren, S., Vella-Azzopardi, R., Beckwée, D., Habbig, A.-K., Scafoglieri, A., Jansen, B., Bautmans, I., Bautmans, I., Verté, D., Beyer, I., Petrovic, M., De Donder, L., Kardol, T., Rossi, G., Clarys, P., Scafoglieri, A., Cattrysse, E., de Hert, P., et Jansen, B. (2016). Frailty and the prediction of negative health outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 17(12), 1163.E1-1163.E17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.010
Westerlund, A., Sundberg, L., et Nilsen, P. (2019). Implementation of Implementation Science Knowledge: The Research-Practice Gap Paradox. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(5), 332-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12403